 not bad for a film camera |
| Review Date: June 11, 2009 |
| Reviewer: J. Talavera, Miami, FL |
| the view lens behind the camera is located on the left hand side of the camera making it difficult to use, most film cameras have it in the middle, this way the user can use either their left of right eye. |
Canon Sure Shot-can do better
|
| Review Date: July 3, 2007 |
| Reviewer: Janeah Ogle, Reno, NV |
| I purcahsed this camera a year ago. I have been continuously disappointed in it. The picture quality is far from impressive. Its easy to use and thats about the best I can say about it. |
loved the camera. but it didnt last long
|
| Review Date: December 13, 2006 |
| Reviewer: sam i am, |
| my camera was great - although it was a little tricky to learn how to take spontaneous photos. but once i got the hang of it i loved it. unfortunately, it died literally just 3 days after the 1-year warranty ended. i sent it back to be repaired and was distressed when i got a reconditioned camera in return - a different model entirely - because a sticker said that my camera was 'unable to be repaired.' it was a shame that a camera that cost $90 only lasted a year and that canon can't repair its own products!! i loved my camera and wish it lasted longer! |
Get a Nikon
|
| Review Date: March 23, 2004 |
| Reviewer: , |
| Received this as a gift. Ran about 5 rolls of film through it. It took decent pictures. Nothing to write home about. Then the lcd stopped working. Canon fixed it under warranty quickly and with no problems. The camera frequently has trouble focusing on subjects. So...good customer support, but only so so operation and pictures. |
|
No video reviews found for this product.
No customer reviews were found for this product.
